HRT Pellets vs Patches for Perimenopause: A Clear Comparison
HRT pellets and patches both deliver hormones but work very differently. Compare their benefits, drawbacks, and who each option suits best.
Two Ways to Deliver Hormones
When it comes to hormone replacement therapy for perimenopause, most people are familiar with patches and pills, but pellet therapy has been growing in popularity over the last decade. Both pellets and patches deliver estrogen and sometimes testosterone transdermally or subcutaneously, bypassing the liver. However, they work in fundamentally different ways and come with very different tradeoffs around convenience, cost, flexibility, and risk. Understanding both options clearly can help you have a better conversation with your doctor about which approach fits your life and your health history.
How HRT Patches Work
Estrogen patches are thin adhesive films worn on the skin, typically on the lower abdomen, buttocks, or upper thigh. They deliver a steady, low-level dose of estrogen through the skin and into the bloodstream, bypassing the digestive system and liver. Most patches are changed once or twice a week depending on the brand. Some patches contain estrogen only and are suitable for women who have had a hysterectomy. Women with a uterus typically use a patch alongside a separate progestogen, either as a separate pill, another patch, or a hormonal IUD. Patches are available in a range of doses and are relatively easy to adjust. If a dose is not working, your doctor can move you up or down without a procedure. They are regulated, widely studied, and covered by most insurance plans in the US and available on prescription in the UK and Australia.
How HRT Pellets Work
Hormone pellets are small, rice-sized cylinders made from compressed hormone powder, usually estradiol and sometimes testosterone. They are inserted under the skin, typically in the upper buttock, through a small incision during an in-office procedure. Once inserted, they dissolve slowly over three to six months, releasing hormones gradually into the bloodstream. The theory is that pellets provide more consistent levels than patches, which can cause minor peaks and troughs with each application. Proponents say this consistency reduces symptom fluctuations. However, pellets are not reversible once inserted. If you have a side effect or the dose turns out to be too high, you cannot remove the pellet and must wait for it to dissolve. Pellets are not FDA-approved as a complete HRT system in the US. They are compounded, meaning they are made individually by pharmacies rather than manufactured to standard drug specifications. This affects quality control and insurance coverage.
Evidence and Safety Considerations
Patches have decades of safety data behind them. Transdermal estrogen in particular has a favorable cardiovascular risk profile compared to oral estrogen because it does not pass through the liver and does not increase clotting factors. This makes patches a preferred option for women with a personal or family history of blood clots. Pellets have less robust long-term safety data. The compounding process means hormone doses can vary between batches, and there is a risk of overdosing, particularly with testosterone pellets. Some women experience supraphysiologic hormone levels, meaning levels significantly above what is natural, after pellet insertion. A 2022 review published in Menopause: The Journal of The Menopause Society noted that while pellets can be effective for symptom relief, the lack of standardized manufacturing and limited long-term safety studies means they should be used with caution.
Practical Differences: Cost, Convenience, and Flexibility
Patches are generally covered by insurance and cost relatively little out of pocket. They require consistent attention: remembering to change them on schedule and making sure they stay adhered to the skin. Some women find they irritate the skin or do not stick well during sweaty activities. Pellets require a small in-office procedure two to four times per year, which has a minor infection risk and can be mildly uncomfortable. They are typically not covered by insurance and can cost between $300 and $600 per insertion. Some women appreciate not having to think about their HRT daily or weekly. The main flexibility disadvantage of pellets is that dose adjustment requires either waiting for the current pellet to dissolve or inserting a new one at a different dose, which means responding to side effects is slower.
Who Tends to Do Best With Each Option
Patches tend to be a strong first-choice option for most women because of the established safety record, adjustability, and lower cost. They are especially suitable if you want to start with a lower dose and titrate carefully, if you have a history of cardiovascular disease or clotting concerns, or if your doctor prefers to use FDA-approved formulations. Pellets may appeal to women who have already tried patches and found that the twice-weekly change schedule is too inconsistent for their lifestyle, or who are interested in testosterone therapy alongside estradiol. Some women who felt symptom fluctuations with patches report more stable symptom control with pellets, though this is individual and not guaranteed.
Making the Choice
The best approach is to start the conversation with a menopause-informed doctor who can review your full health history. If you are new to HRT, patches offer a well-studied, adjustable starting point. If you have been on HRT for a while and are looking for better consistency or want to explore testosterone, pellets might be worth discussing with a practitioner who has specific experience in pellet therapy and can monitor your hormone levels closely. Either way, ask about progestogen if you have a uterus, discuss follow-up blood work, and be clear about your priorities around convenience, cost, and flexibility.
Related reading
Get your personalized daily plan
Track symptoms, match workouts to your day type, and build a routine that adapts with you through every phase of perimenopause.